But It Has Bipartisan Support E-mail
Written by Robert W. Peck   
Tuesday, 22 March 2011 15:05

A friend recently directed my attention to a YouTube video clip of a U.S. Senate hearing in which newly elected Senator, Rand Paul, unloaded a barge of righteous indignation on a bureaucrat from one of those multitude of federal agencies that seem determined to regulate every facet of our lives. While Senator Paul's grilling of Kathleen Hogan from the Department of Energy was enjoyable enough to watch, I found Ms. Hogan's response to the Senator to be the most telling part of the video.

Senator Paul let loose on Ms. Hogan and her agency for denying the American people the ability to choose what kind of light bulb, toilet or refrigerator we will purchase, calling them hypocrites and busybodies. Ms. Hogan's defense of her administration and its encroachments into our lives was that: “. . . the appliance standards program is an example of really a great partnership between the Congress and the administration over many many many years. So much of what we are implementing really had its genesis in bipartisan bills that had been put forth at a number of different points over the history of this country for the last 30 to 40 years.”

Read more...
 
Trading Away Sovereignty E-mail
Written by Virgil Goode   
Tuesday, 15 March 2011 10:44

Virgil_GoodeLast week, the New York Times reported that Obama received "rare bipartisan praise" from Republicans when he signed the South Korean Free Trade agreement, known as KORUS, last December. However Republicans stalled congressional approval of the agreement, largely because of "partisan feuding," in part because Republicans want even more free trade agreements with Columbia and Panama.

While I am glad that KORUS is stalled, Republicans should oppose it on principle because it creates a globalist bureaucracy that will cost hundreds of thousands of American jobs, not because of partisan bickering over how quickly we expand these globalist agreements.

Republican supporters of KORUS claim that the agreement is about promoting capitalism, free markets, and free trade. The truth is that this agreement does not promote free markets. On the contrary, it will make American businesses more regulated.

Read more...
 
Pure Spending E-mail
Written by Ken Braun   
Friday, 04 March 2011 10:21
Republicans scored significant electoral gains last November by promising to rein in runaway spending and put state government’s fiscal house in order. Yet in an early spending vote, the Michigan Legislature — now decisively under GOP control — voted overwhelmingly to increase the cost of a government tourism industry subsidy by 65 percent above what had already been allocated for the year. New GOP Gov. Rick Snyder asked for the increased spending, and the bill awaits his signature.

Despite concerns about the basic fairness of the program, the propriety of spending more money on it, and its overall effectiveness, just seven Republicans voted “no."

At issue was House Bill 4160, legislation that increased the current year's cost of the “Pure Michigan” tourism promotion from $15.4 million to $25.4 million. Snyder stated in his first State of the State address that he wanted the higher cost for the program. During the Granholm administration, spending for Pure Michigan and other promotional advertisements had been as high as $33.2 million.

Read more...
 
In Praise of Caldwell, Clark, Houghton, And Muhlenberg E-mail
Written by Chuck Baldwin   
Tuesday, 01 March 2011 20:03

chuck_baldwin Archived Columns, Columns by Chuck Baldwin

It really wasn't that long ago. With the way America's clergymen act today, however, one would think that preachers such as James Caldwell, Jonas Clark, Joab Houghton, and John Peter Muhlenberg never existed. But they did exist; and without them, it is this country we call the United States of America that would not exist.

Caldwell was a Presbyterian; Muhlenberg was a Lutheran; Houghton was a Baptist; and no one really seems to know what denomination (if any) Jonas Clark claimed. But these men had one thing in common (besides their faith in Jesus Christ): they were all ardent patriots who actually participated in America's War for Independence.

James Caldwell

James Caldwell was called "The Rebel High Priest" or "The Fighting Chaplain." Caldwell is most famous for the "Give 'em Watts!" story.

During the Springfield (New Jersey) engagement, the colonial militia ran out of wadding for their muskets. Quickly, Caldwell galloped to the Presbyterian church, and returning with an armload of hymnals, threw them to the ground, and hollered, "Now, boys, give 'em Watts!" He was referring to the famous hymn writer, Isaac Watts, of course.

The British hated Caldwell so much, they murdered his wife, Hannah, in her own home, as she sat with her children on her bed. Later, a fellow American who had been bribed by the British to assassinate the preacher murdered Caldwell. Americans loyal to the Crown burned both his house and church. No less than three cities and two public schools in the State of New Jersey bear his name.

 

Read more...
 
The Spirit of Partisan Politics E-mail
Written by Robert W. Peck   
Friday, 11 February 2011 15:37

THE SPIRIT OF PARTISAN POLITICS

The subject of partisan politics recently crossed my path – not just the fact that partisan politics exists (something we're all well aware of), but rather the dangers that it holds, its subtle nature and the extent to which it has crept into our thought process. Having been politically active for nearly two decades now, more than half that time spent in positions of leadership in both my county, state and national party, it seems I would have already learned this lesson.

Most of us are aware of President George Washington's warning in his Farewell Address as to the danger of partisan politics. However, we have grown forgetful of that warning and are failing to perceive the effect that the spirit of partisan politics is having on our political landscape. Most of all, we are woefully unaware of the degree to which we ourselves have fallen prey to the mentality of partisan politics.

I am certainly not against the use of a political party as an organization that serves as a vehicle for promoting certain principles and for supporting candidates for public office who uphold those principles. I'm the chairman of a political party and I am constantly encouraging people to join my party and participate in the political process by supporting candidates for office who uphold Constitutional principles and sound moral values.

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 7 of 14